![]() ![]() ![]() #25 You easily sympathize with others' struggles. #24 You find it difficult to concentrate on a single subject. #23 You often use metaphors to communicate new ideas. #22 You tend to express sympathy only after you empathize with someone. #21 You consider yourself a practical and realistic person, free from imagination. #20 You place a lot of value on details and past experiences. #19 You are described as "stuck in your ways." #18 You can easily think of something random to say. #17 You sometimes fail to adapt to new data because it is not consistent with your personal understanding of an idea. #16 You are skilled at recognizing whether the details in front of you match what you are used to. #15 You greatly value social harmony and often go out of your way to maintain it. #14 You may be seen as reckless and unknowingly hurt those around you. #13 You trust hard facts and data more than anything else. #12 You are attracted to symbolism, mysticism and the unknown. #11 You feel as though you are one of the only truly nice people left in this world. #10 You relate present experiences back to past experiences. #9 You would rather sugarcoat a problem than upset someone. #8 You are an excellent problem solver and have an incredible ability to analyze things in depth. #7 You often feel awkward and aimless during leisure time. #6 You have a strong tendency to see things as either good or bad. #5 You prefer living in your dreams to living in the real world. #4 You are drawn to the new, novel, and original. #3 You thrive on new and exciting experiences. #2 You place a great amount of trust in the mysterious and unconscious world. #1 You become upset when your care for others goes unappreciated. Scroll down to view your results after submitting. You can select five options per question, where the rightmost choice corresponds to "agree" and the leftmost choice corresponds to "disagree." The three options in the middle correspond to only moderate preferences for each side, the middle option being specifically for "no preference for either side." To aid you in remembering this, "agree" and "disagree" have been labeled on their corresponding columns. ![]() The Myers letters - this test also attempts to calculate your '16 personalities' type through a careful examination of each question and how it would correlation with each of the eight preferences though roundabout and based only on theoretical correlations, it is reasonable to assume that this result will be more accurate than the previously mentioned algorithms in determining your Myers letter type. The Myers model - this algorithm stays as true as possible to how Isabel Myers had envisioned function orientations in her types, especially emphasizing the importance of the extraverted functions in determining type. The axis-based model - this algorithm uses preferences for function axes to arrive at a type, a practice commonly used by magicians and typologists today. The Grant/Brownsword model - though untrue to Grant's definitions for the types and their functions in From Image to Likeness: A Jungian Path in the Gospel Journey and those of Brownsword's in It Takes All Types! and Psychological Type: An Introduction, this test tries to reconcile the type development stack first proposed by Grant with the more Myers-centric (as opposed to Jung-centric) definitions for the functions used by the typology community today. Your results will be calculated into a table using four different methods: I label what was formerly indicated as such with "Myers letters" to avoid confusion. That refers to a trademarked test that this test has nothing to do with, as these questions are my own and calculate type differently. This is not a Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) test. If you would like to contribute translations, please e-mail me at You may inquire about advertising opportunities. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |